Still think it doesn't matter how long we wait before we clamp the cord? A new study shows 4-year-olds have better neurological development if they didn't have immediate cord clamping, especially boys. Seems to me, these studies should have been done before we adopted an intervention in a natural process, not years later.
Some procedures during birth and after I can honestly understand both sides of what is normally practiced by the medical as well as the midwifery model of care. GBS screening, vitamin K injections, and eye ointment are just a few topics that while I may have my own opinion, I at least can understand why some have the opposite opinion. Immediate cord clamping is not one of those subjects. I really, truly can't understand why it's done. Common sense dictates that naturally letting the cord stop pulsing so that the baby gets the correct amount of blood is best. Here is an article from an obstetrician explaining that the evidence shows a very small delay in cord clamping is beneficial, especially for preemies. I especially like the part where he admits that the reason doctors have been so resistant to the practice is because it was first practiced by midwives. That must have been very hard for him to admit, and it's the attitude we all need if we want to see the best births for every woman and every baby. This is one of the many procedures and issues parents need to become informed about before their baby's arrival. That's why I'm teaching natural childbirth classes in San Angelo!
I'm a natural childbirth educator, lactation consultant (IBCLC), and doula in Athens, AL. Here is where I put healthy recipes, current research, and helpful articles for pregnancy, postpartum, and life in general. Check back often!